The Standards Landscape for EV Charging in the U.S.

EV Charging Standards at a Glance

Electric-vehicle (EV) charging standards shape everything from plug geometry to network uptime and a single missed rule can block market entry.

Yet many hardware teams see only fragments: a UL safety test here, a National Electrical Code (NEC) clause there, or a few Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP) lines of code added late in development. That piecemeal approach collapses once projects scale and funding programs demand 97% uptime compliance.

This guide assembles the full picture. It introduces the three-layer framework that governs every charging project – equipment safety under UL and IEC standards, installation rules under NEC Article 625, and communication protocols such as OCPP 2.0.1 and ISO 15118. Understanding how these layers interlock turns compliance from a last-minute scramble into a design advantage.

What follows maps that framework, explores key safety benchmarks, and traces how “voluntary” standards evolved into gatekeepers for funding, interoperability, and long-term reliability.

‍

Key Points

• View EV charger compliance as a three-layer stack—UL safety tests, NEC Article 625 installation rules, and OCPP/ISO 15118 communications—because a miss in any layer can halt permits or sink the 97% uptime now demanded by federal programs.
• Obtain a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) listing (UL 2594, UL 2202, UL 2251, etc.) early; passing lab tests and ongoing factory audits are mandatory for inspectors and far cheaper than redesigns after tooling.
• Engineer products to meet National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) grant criteria—including high uptime, open card payments, OCPP/ISO support, and Buy America compliance (with phased domestic content rules)—so your charging stations are eligible for federal funding and avoid costly retrofits.
• Build OCPP 2.0.1 and ISO 15118 into firmware from the start; remote diagnostics and “Plug & Charge” authentication raise reliability and future-proof the charger as automakers adopt these protocols.
• Loop in compliance advisors, utilities, and authorities having jurisdiction (AHJs) during design to align wiring, load studies, and permits; this upfront coordination turns field inspection from a blocker into a fast, predictable sign-off.

Decoding the Layered Rulebook for EV Chargers

EV charging compliance functions as a three-layer system. Each layer must align for a charger to reach the market and stay certified.

• (Base Layer) Equipment safety: Standards such as UL 2202 and UL 2594 verify protection against shock, fire, and ground faults for both AC and DC chargers. These UL and IEC tests establish the baseline that every subsequent inspection builds upon.
• (Middle layer) Installation code: NEC Article 625 governs wiring, grounding, and disconnects but stops short of dictating exact conductor sizes or GFCI specifications. Local inspectors – or Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJs) – enforce this layer before energization. Because Article 625 references listed equipment, it effectively pulls UL results into field enforcement.
• (Top layer) Communication and uptime: This layer governs how chargers, vehicles, and networks interact. Modern implementations rely on open standards such as OCPP 2.0.1 and ISO 15118, which together support remote management, interoperability, and Plug & Charge authentication.

When all three layers align, compliance becomes seamless. A single mismatch, however, can bring the entire system out of spec.

Safety Benchmarks: UL and Beyond for EV Charging Standards

EV charging safety standards define the non-negotiable floor for entering the market.

• UL 2594 tests residential and commercial AC chargers up to 1000 V for cord strain, over-temperature limits, enclosure integrity, and other electrical hazards.
• UL 2202 applies to high-power DC fast chargers, verifying dielectric strength, insulation resistance, and fault-current performance.
• UL 2251 governs the connector itself – pin dimensions, latch strength, and 10 000-cycle durability – ensuring mechanical reliability over years of use.
• IEC 61851 mirrors many UL requirements for international markets, while SAE J1772 defines the vehicle-side interface used by most North American EVs.
• NRTLs such as Intertek or UL Solutions list the product once all tests are passed, then perform recurring factory audits to verify continued conformity. This turns safety into an ongoing responsibility rather than a one-time certificate.
• GFCI thresholds, flame-spread ratings, and touch-safe voltage limits derive from UL and related safety standards. As Ken Boyce of UL Solutions explains, labs “mandate the outcomes” but leave design paths open to engineers.

For startups, mapping each safety requirement early avoids costly redesigns when factory audits uncover a missing relay or inadequate protection circuit.

In short, meet safety first or nothing else moves.

Why Today’s Rules Exist: Regulatory Inflection Points

The history of EV charging regulation shows how optional guidance hardened into mandatory gates over just two decades.

• 1996 – NEC Article 625: The National Electrical Code introduced Article 625, setting foundational requirements for listed EV charging systems. Adoption and enforcement still vary by jurisdiction, but it established the precedent that only listed equipment could be installed.
• 2001 – SAE J1772: The California Air Resources Board adopted the SAE J1772 connector for early plug-in hybrids, standardizing the AC plug and ending regional incompatibility.
• Mid-2010s – UL 2202 Becomes Law by Reference: As DC fast charging expanded, UL 2202 filled the safety gap. Once states began citing it in electrical codes, a formerly voluntary test became a building-permit prerequisite.
• 2023 – NEVI Standards and Federal Oversight: The federal National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program formalized interoperability and uptime requirements, tying them directly to funding eligibility. Regulators now use communication standards like OCPP and ISO 15118 to enforce network reliability – a shift noted by industry experts such as Raghav Murali.

Each milestone tightened the link between standards, compliance, and market access.

Understanding that trajectory helps design teams anticipate the next inflection – such as bidirectional-charging rules now forming around UL 9741 – and build products ready for tomorrow’s mandates rather than yesterday’s checklists.

Protocol Implementation for Uptime

Smart charging lives or dies on communication between chargers, vehicles, and networks. Two protocols form the foundation of that exchange, and a third ensures interoperability across providers.

OCPP 2.0.1 manages the link between the charger and its network, adding device management, cybersecurity hooks, and detailed error codes that let operators reboot a frozen port remotely instead of dispatching a technician.

When networks automate responses to those diagnostic codes, uptime rates rise toward the 97 percent reliability required by federal funding.

ISO 15118 governs the handshake between the vehicle and charger.

It enables Plug & Charge through encrypted digital certificates, replacing RFID cards and mobile apps with instant, authenticated sessions. The same secure channel supports off-peak scheduling and grid-responsive load control, allowing each charging port to act as a managed energy resource.

Finally, the Open Charge Point Interface (OCPI) protocol connects networks themselves, standardizing roaming and billing so drivers receive one invoice even when moving between providers.

When OCPP, ISO 15118, and OCPI operate in concert, drivers experience frictionless charging, utilities gain predictable load data, and manufacturers cut down on costly, protocol-related service calls.

Design-to-Listing Playbook: NRTLs, Factory Audits & Advisory

A lab logo on the nameplate is not a strategy.

Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories (NRTLs) like Intertek or UL Solutions test against safety standards and issue the coveted product “listing” required by most inspectors.

That listing proves the hardware met UL 2202, UL 2594, or similar rules on the day it left the lab, and ongoing factory audits verify nothing drifts out of spec during mass production.

Yet Ken Boyce reminds us labs “mandate the outcomes” without telling you how to reach them, leaving design teams to decode each clause on their own.

Common pitfalls when selecting EV charger testing labs:

• Late engagement: Waiting until tooling is complete can turn a failed dielectric test into a six-month redesign.
• Scope creep: Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), payment security, and grid-tie tests sit outside a basic safety file and may require separate chambers or agencies.
• One-size bids: A lowest-cost quote may skip field evaluations or installation reviews that AHJs later request.

Independent compliance advisors bridge those gaps by translating code language into design tactics before the first board is etched. They also arbitrate between overlapping standards—say, FCC Part 15 emissions and UL leakage current—so teams avoid conflicting fixes.

In short, the right partner pairs NRTL authority with early-stage guidance, reducing rework, recalls, and market-entry delays.

Translating NEVI & Buy America into Specs

Federal dollars come with fine print.

The National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) rule ties grants to uptime, power, payment, and sourcing targets.

Each port must demonstrate 97% annual availability, calculated monthly over five years. Exceptions exist for vandalism and natural disasters—but not for firmware bugs. Meeting that threshold requires proactive diagnostics, stocked spare parts, and service-level agreements built into contracts from day one.

Payment rules require open, Payment Card Industry (PCI)-compliant card readers and transparent price displays, banning “app-only” walls that strand new drivers. Interoperability clauses mandate OCPP and ISO 15118 support, ensuring any qualified network can operate the site after the grant period.

Meanwhile, Buy America rules will soon require that iron, steel, and final assembly for EV chargers happen in the U.S., with additional domestic content rules for components. Until July 2024, a broad waiver allows more flexibility, but waivers may still be available later for components with no U.S. source.

Ignoring these threads can balloon costs: retrofitting a non-compliant terminal or swapping offshore subassemblies mid-project erodes margins fast. Aligning design specs with NEVI checklists at kickoff lets teams tap grants, attract private co-investment, and keep cash for innovation instead of do-overs.

Applying NEC 625 from Drawings to Commissioning

A charger that is safe in the lab can still fail on the curb.

Field success depends on how well installation standards—especially NEC Article 625, local utility rules, and AHJ inspections—are executed in sequence. Even two mislabeled wires or a missed permit can delay energization for weeks.

Follow a five-step loop from paper to power:

1. Start with the drawings: Size branch circuits, overcurrent devices, and disconnects exactly as Article 625 requires, including the 125% continuous load rule.
2. Specify listed equipment: Call out UL-listed AC or DC hardware so inspectors can match the nameplate to their checklist.
3. Loop in the utility early: Submit load calculations and, if the site is bidirectional, show compliance with IEEE 1547 interconnection rules.
4. Secure permits: The authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) reviews plans, approves trenching, and visits the site before energization.
5. Commission and document: Run insulation, GFCI, and network checks, then log an initial OCPP session so future uptime audits have a baseline.

Treat this five-step loop as a living playbook; adjust it for local amendments but keep the order. Three clean signatures—utility, AHJ, and owner—mean the charger can flip from “construction” to “revenue” without surprises.

‍

Conclusion

EV charging standards form a three-layer system – equipment safety, field installation, and data interoperability – each dependent on the others. A gap in any layer can stall approvals or cripple reliability.

Teams that integrate UL listings, Article 625 wiring, and OCPP or ISO 15118 protocols into one cohesive plan minimize rework and accelerate revenue. Independent compliance advisors bridge gray areas between standards, reconcile code conflicts, and anticipate shifts such as bidirectional UL 9741 before they reach enforcement.

When viewed as a roadmap rather than a roadblock, the standards landscape becomes a strategic framework – one that builds trust, ensures uptime, and scales market access.

‍