UL History: From 1894 Electrical Lab to Global Safety Powerhouse—What Startups Need to Know

Let’s say you’re a startup founder, and you recently landed a big-box retailer contract.

Then, you learn that the deal hinges on one non-negotiable detail: the product needs a UL Listed Mark on every carton. So, you scramble, re-engineer a power board, and burn six weeks.

This pain is all too common. If that sounds familiar, you’re not alone.

UL (Underwriters Laboratories), the 130-year-old safety certifier whose approval (“mark”) retailers and insurers treat as the gold standard for product safety, often decides whether you can ship. Understanding how it got that position can be helpful in making the chaos predictable—and avoidable.

Below is a founder-friendly guide that distills 130 years of UL history into practical lessons for modern product launches.

‍

Key Points

• UL’s 130-year brand equity makes the UL Listed mark a default safety gatekeeper for many retailers, insurers, and fire inspectors, so hardware startups must budget and plan for certification early to avoid costly shipping delays.
• Since 2012 UL has split into nonprofit standards bodies and the for-profit UL Solutions lab; knowing this lets founders negotiate scope, compare fees, and address conflict-of-interest concerns.
• OSHA treats all Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories (ETL, CSA, TÜV, MET, etc.) equally, so teams can often choose faster or cheaper labs—provided the chosen mark is pre-approved by target retailers and regulators.
• Certification choice should be strategic: pay UL’s premium when its mark boosts consumer trust or retailer access, but pivot to other NRTLs when speed, global market integration, or budget is the priority.

Why UL History Matters for Modern Hardware Startups

UL history matters because the organization’s century-plus track record underpins today’s retailer and regulator expectations. Stamped on an estimated 22 billion products every year (PBSI on the Net), the UL Mark signals that a product meets consensus safety standards. Buyers, insurers, and fire marshals rely on that legacy; startups that ignore it risk shipment holds, liability exposure, and missed market windows.

Key takeaways for founders

• Historical credibility equals market access: UL’s early focus on fire prevention made the Mark a shorthand for electrical safety. Retailers still default to it for due diligence.
• Process inertia drives timelines: UL’s inspection and certification process is governed by longstanding, deeply rooted procedures that date back over 100 years. As a result, delays in getting certified often result from companies not having their documentation and factory quality systems fully prepared—these factors slow down the process more than test laboratory backlogs or physical product testing speed.
• Cost transparency: Knowing that UL grew out of a testing lab (not a regulator) helps teams negotiate scope and compare fees with other Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories (NRTLs).

The Founding Era: Electrical Fire Risks and the Birth of UL

The story starts at the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago. Electrical engineer William Henry Merrill Jr. was asked to investigate the fair’s lighting safety. Alarmed by ad-hoc wiring and fire hazards, Merrill envisioned a permanent laboratory dedicated to “safety science.” He founded the Underwriters’ Electrical Bureau in 1894—later renamed Underwriters Laboratories or UL (UL History).

Early milestones

• First test (1894): Asbestos-insulated wiring sample examined for fire resistance (Encyclopedia.com).
• First Standard for Safety (1903): Tin-clad fire doors, still referenced in building codes today (PBSI on the Net).
• World War I service: Merrill’s $1-salary leadership of the War Industries Board’s Fire Prevention Section led UL teams to audit 2,444 munitions plants, cutting catastrophic fires and cementing UL’s public-service reputation (World War I Centennial).

This founding ethos—independent testing for insurer confidence—shapes UL’s role today: a private, consensus-based body whose Marks open doors to insurance underwriting and retail distribution.

Building the UL Mark: From Label Service to Global Recognition

By 1906 UL launched its Label Service, sending inspectors to factories to authorize use of the UL Mark on compliant products. The model paired product testing with ongoing factory surveillance, creating a virtuous cycle of trust for insurers and retailers.

Milestone moments (Encylopedia.com, UL History):

• First UL appliance certification (1915): A vacuum cleaner, marking UL’s expansion beyond building components and wiring. This breakthrough reassured consumers that small motors in homes were safe.
• Recognized Component Program (1920s): Allowed manufacturers to pre-certify parts—like power supplies—reducing redundancy in end-product certification.
• Global scale: Today the Mark appears on billions of products annually

For startups, the Mark’s century of brand equity means investors and customers often equate “UL Listed” with “safe,” even if equivalent NRTL Marks exist.

The Nonprofit vs. For-Profit Split: Understanding UL’s 2012 Restructuring

In the 2010s, UL reorganized to separate standards development from commercial services. A 2022 rebrand clarified three distinct entities:

• UL Research Institutes – Basic safety science research (nonprofit).
• UL Standards & Engagement – Writes and harmonizes safety standards via consensus committees (nonprofit).
• UL Solutions – Testing, certification, and advisory services (for-profit).

Why the split matters

• Conflict-of-interest concerns: Critics argue that a for-profit lab could “mark its own homework.” The nonprofit arm retains formal control of standards to reduce that perception.
• Consensus remains intact: Standards committees still include industry, academia, and regulators, preserving public transparency.
• Budget insights: Knowing UL Solutions operates commercially helps startups negotiate scope and compare quotes instead of assuming one fixed price.

Inside UL Solutions Today: How Testing, Inspection, and Factory Audits Work

UL Solutions follows a structured path that startups should map early.

1. Application & quotation
   
   • Submit product description, schematics, and bill of materials.‍
2. Documentation review‍
   
   • Safety critical components must already be Recognized or Listed; otherwise additional testing is added.‍
3. Sample testing‍
   
   • Environmental, electrical, mechanical, and sometimes chemical tests.
   • Common failure causes: undersized traces, inadequate creepage/clearance, unlisted power supplies.‍
4. Initial factory inspection (IFI)‍
   
   • UL auditor verifies production line, control of critical components, and labeling process.‍
5. Certification & Listing‍
   
   • Your product is posted to UL’s Online Certifications Directory; Labels can be ordered.‍
6. Ongoing surveillance‍
   
   • Quarterly or semi-annual audits. Non-conformities can trigger product holds.

Typical timeline: 8-12 weeks for straightforward consumer electronics; longer if redesigns are needed (Leigh Sourcing). Early gap analyses can compress cycles.

Alternative Paths: Comparing UL to ETL, CSA, TÜV and Other NRTLs

The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recognizes multiple independent labs as Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories (NRTLs)—organizations deemed competent to certify products to safety standards.

Competitive snapshot

• Intertek/ETL
  
  • Typically completes certification 2–3 weeks faster than UL, with costs reported to be 20–40% less for comparable services.
  • Widely accepted by major U.S. retailers, including Amazon, Walmart, and Home Depot; recognized throughout North America.
• CSA Group
  
  • Strong presence in Canada and northern U.S. utilities.
  • Bundles certification for U.S. and Canadian markets, which may lower total cost for North American-focused products; cost is generally comparable to UL for single-market certifications.
• TÜV Rheinland/TÜV SÜD
  
  • Extensive experience with international CB Scheme, IEC, and EU directives, facilitating streamlined access to European and Asian markets
  • Perception: High rigor for medical and automotive sectors.

(Sources: Smart Tech Cables, The MCAA, TUV, Jing Sourcing)

All these labs issue NRTL Marks that OSHA treats equally. However, some retailers and fire inspectors remain more familiar with the UL Mark, so founders should validate acceptance criteria before choosing a lab.

Strategic Certification Planning: When to Choose UL and When to Look Elsewhere

Use the decision matrix below to pick the right path.

• Regulatory mandate
  
  • OSHA electrical safety in workplaces requires an NRTL Mark, not necessarily UL.
• Retailer preference
  
  • Big-box stores often list “UL or equivalent.” Confirm in writing.
• Global market goals
  
  • If expanding to EU, a lab with CB Scheme reach (TÜV, Intertek) might streamline CE marking.
• Budget and timeline
  
  • For tight launch dates, ETL’s faster bookings can be decisive.
• Marketing value
  
  • In new industries, being first to get compliance marks can offer brand trust resulting in customers paying a premium price.

Kite Compliance's solution can help you arbitrate these factors and avoid vendor lock-in—turning certification from a reactive hurdle into a strategic trust signal.

Conclusion: Turning History into a Future Advantage

UL’s journey from a three-person fire-safety lab to a global certification powerhouse explains why its Mark still unlocks store shelves and insurance coverage. Knowing that history—and the nuances of UL’s nonprofit standards arm versus its for-profit testing business—equips startups to treat compliance as a strategic lever. Paired with an unbiased compliance advisor, founders can choose UL when it adds brand trust, pivot to other NRTLs when speed or budget demands, and bring safer products to market without last-minute firefighting.